Bills Passed by House of Representatives 112th Congress
The 113th United States Congress was the 2013-2014 meeting of the legislative branch of the U.s. federal government, composed of the Senate and the Business firm of Representatives. The 113th Congress offset convened in Washington, D.C. on Jan 3, 2013, and ended on Jan iii, 2015. At the time, it was the most various Congress in the nation's history, owing to a record number of newly elected women and minorities. Six years afterwards House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D) was elected the first female person Speaker, the chamber's Democrats swore in 58 women and 72 minorities, making information technology the first ever congressional caucus from either party or chamber where Caucasian men do not make upwards the majority.[1]
The freshman members, including the offset Buddhist senator, first Hindu representative and beginning open bisexual female representative, were elected on November 6, 2012.[1]
The appointments of Tim Scott (R) and Mo Cowan (D) marked the showtime time in U.s.a. history where 2 blackness senators served in the U.Due south. Senate at the same fourth dimension (Cowan did not seek the seat in the special election).[2]
In addition to its multifariousness, the composition of the 113th Congress was notable for its inexperience. In Feb 2013, the Washington Mail published a story exploring how the electric current generation of congressional committee leaders encounter the dismantlement of traditional lawmaking process, and their roles within it, every bit a consequence of Congress' contempo bulge of freshmen members. Reinforcing their theory, the report cited that over one tertiary of House members, and 32 of the Senate'due south 100 members, had "served two years or less."[3]
At the conclusion of the 113th Congress, many stance polls and analysis labeled the session as the "worst congress in history." This was due to blessing ratings that reached an all-time low along with a perception of gridlock and low productivity.[4]
Events
ACA cancellations
When the Affordable Care Deed (ACA or usually referred to every bit Obamacare) was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, there was much debate virtually what would happen to citizens' existing plans under the new healthcare reform.[5] I statement made repeatedly by the President, assistants and Congressional supporters, was some form of the line Obama gave in an Baronial 22, 2009, internet address, proverb, "If yous like your private health insurance program, you can proceed your plan. Catamenia."[six]
When the law was enacted on Oct 1, 2013, many individually insured people began receiving letters from their insurance carriers notifying them that their current plans would be canceled at the end of the policy term. The plans were canceled because they did not come across new minimum coverage requirements prepare by the law.[seven] On October 29, 2013, NBC News reported that 50-75 percent of the fourteen million Americans with individual healthcare plans would receive a cancellation detect in the next year.
On Nov 14, 2013, under force per unit area from Democratic members of Congress, President Obama announced the administration's intention to allow people whose insurance plans had been canceled to re-enroll in their plans. On December nineteen, 2013, the administration announced that those whose plans were canceled under the law met the Health and Human being Services Section's "hardship exemption." The stated exemption covered those who "experienced financial or domestic circumstances, including an unexpected natural or human being-caused effect, such that he or she had a significant, unexpected increase in essential expenses that prevented him or her from obtaining coverage under a qualified wellness programme."[8] On March five, 2014, the delayed mandate was pushed dorsum another year, until 2015, for those who had their plans canceled.
2013 Farm bills
House
On June xx, 2013, the House voted downwards its own version of the massive farm bill that would have ready the course of U.Due south. food policy for the next half-decade. The House version was 629 pages long, costing approximately $939.five billion over 10 years.[ix]
Members voted down the bill in a 195-234 vote that just won 24 Democratic votes.[10] [11] Most Democrats voted against the bill because it cut nutrient stamp programs past more than $20 billion, while many Republicans also voted no, proverb it was too expensive a bill to pass when the country has $17 trillion in debt.[xi]
Senate
On June x, 2013, the Senate voted 66 to 27 to approve a subcontract pecker that was expected to help prepare the course of U.S. food policy. The old farm bill expired in 2012, and the new Senate farm beak was one,150 pages long, costing approximately $955 billion over 10 years.[12]
Comparison the bills
Compared with the Senate bill, the House bill had less money designated for nutrient stamps and nutrition. In that location was also somewhat less money for conservation, slightly deeper cuts to commodity payments and a fleck more money for crop insurance, due to a number of unlike rules used to calculate payments.[13]
Firm vote on abortion ban
On June 18, 2013, the Business firm voted 228-196, mostly along party lines, to approve a ban on tardily-term abortions, or abortions occurring after 20 weeks of pregnancy.[14] [15] A number of members crossed over party lines in their votes. Some of the notable votes included:
Republicans who voted against:
- Rob Woodall
- Paul Broun
- Jon Runyan
- Rodney Frelinghuysen
- Richard Hanna
- Charlie Paring
Note: Reps. Woodall and Broun were opposed considering they felt the beak did non go far enough and left exceptions to the ban.[sixteen]
Democrats who voted in favor:
- Dan Lipinski
- Collin Peterson
- Mike McIntyre
- Henry Cuellar
- Jim Matheson
- Nick Rahall
2013 Budget Proposals
Paul Ryan Budget Plan
In March 2013 the Republican-controlled House passed the budget proposal ready out by Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan (R) for the third straight year.[17] However, not all Republican representatives voted in favor of the proposal.[17] X Republican Representatives voted against Ryan'due south budget proposal.[17] The 10 Republican Representatives included Justin Amash, Paul Broun, Rick Crawford, Randy Forbes, Chris Gibson, Phil Gingrey, Joe Heck, Walter Jones, Tom Massie and David McKinley.
The proposal was killed after being voted downward in the U.S. Senate with a 40-59 vote.[18]
The proposal would have cutting about $5 trillion over the next decade and aimed to balance the upkeep by the cease of the 10-twelvemonth menstruation. The 2013 beak had opposition from 10 Republicans — the same number that voted against it in 2012. In 2011 only iv Republicans cast a vote in opposition. Democrats unanimously voted against the pecker every year.
Senate Budget Proposal
On March 23, 2013, afterwards an all-night argue that ended just before 5 a.m., by a fifty to 49 vote the Democrat-controlled Senate approved its get-go budget in four years.[19] No Republicans voted for the Senate program, and iv Democrats, Marking Pryor, Kay Hagan, Mark Begich and Max Baucus, opposed information technology. All four were from cherry-red states and were up for re-election in 2014.[19]
The approved program was a $3.vii trillion budget for 2022 and provided a fast track for passage of tax increases, trim spending modestly and leave the government still deeply in the cherry for the side by side decade.[19]
The blessing of a budget in the Senate began the process of setting up contentious negotiations with the Republican-controlled House in April 2013 to reconcile two vastly dissimilar plans for dealing with the nation's economic and monetary issues.
The House plan would have brought the government's taxes and spending into balance past 2023 with cuts to domestic spending even below the levels of automated all-embracing cuts for federal programs at the time, and it ordered up dramatic and controversial changes to Medicare and the tax code.[19]
The Senate plan differed greatly, and included $100 billion in upfront infrastructure spending to bolster the economic system and calls for special fast-track rules to overhaul the tax code and heighten $975 billion over 10 years in legislation that could not be filibustered. Even with that tax increment and prescribed spending cuts, the program approved past the Senate would leave the authorities with a $566 billion almanac deficit in 10 years, and $5.ii trillion in additional debt over that window.
A upkeep was not passed.[19]
March 2013 filibuster
-
- See also: Rand Paul filibuster of John Brennan'due south CIA Nomination in March 2013
"I rise today to begin to filibuster John Brennan's nomination for the CIA. I will speak until I tin can no longer speak."[20] With these words Sen. Rand Paul initiated a filibuster to filibuster the senate vote on the confirmation of the President's nominee to the head of the CIA and to depict attending to the questions surrounding the utilise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or "drones" past the executive branch. Paul began speaking shortly before noon on Midweek and continued to speak for 12 hours and 52 minutes, which marks his speech as the 9th longest delay in the history of the Senate.[21] When asked why this sort of outcome does not occur more than often, Paul explained that since who speaks on the Senate floor is decided by the leadership of the Senate, it's oft difficult to begin a traditional filibuster. "One of the reasons filibusters don't occur is because they carefully guard the floor from letting information technology happen. And it was left unguarded," he said. "Nosotros had no plan and I had the wrong shoes on, my feet were hurting the whole day."[22]
The main topic of Paul's spoken language was the use of drones as a means of attacking American citizens on U.S. soil, asking "Your notification is the buzz of propellers on the drone as it flies overhead in the seconds before you're killed. Is that what we really want from our government?"[23]. Paul protested the lack of transparency in the drone program, asking "What will be the standard for how nosotros kill Americans in America?... Could political dissent be part of the standard for drone strikes?"[24] Paul questioned the President's refusal to country publicly that such strikes would not be used against citizens on U.S. soil saying, "[Obama] says trust him because he hasn't done it nevertheless. He says he doesn't intend to do so, but he might. Mr. President, that's non proficient enough . . . and then I've come hither to speak for as long every bit I tin to describe attending to something that I observe to really be very agonizing."[25] Paul concluded his remarks asking for his counterparts on the other side of the aisle to join him in his efforts to obtain clarification from the president.[26]
A total of 14 senators joined Paul in the filibuster -- 13 Republicans and ane Democrat.[27] [28] [29] Co-ordinate to the website Breitbart, 30 Republican senators did not support the filibuster.[30] [31] The day afterwards the delay, Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to Paul, responding to the filibuster. Holder wrote, "Does the president have the authority to employ a weaponized drone to impale an American not engaged in gainsay on U.S. soil? The answer to that is no."[32]
Nuclear option for nominees
On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option in the Senate. The nuclear selection uses an interpretation of Senate procedure to be able to change sleeping room rules with a simple majority vote. In this case, the option was used to modify the vote requirement for executive nominee confirmations to be considered on the floor.[33] Prior to the rule change, Senators could delay until a cloture motion requiring sixty votes was passed in the bedchamber. The nuclear pick changed the requirement to a elementary majority. The threat of the nuclear option occurred in many Congresses, only none had put the option into use.[34]
The nuclear option was invoked in response to Senate Republicans blocking the nomination of three D.C. Excursion Courtroom judges. The rule change passed by a vote of 52-48, with Carl Levin, Joe Manchin and Marker Pryor being the only Democrats to vote in opposition. Co-ordinate to the Congressional Research Service, of the 67 times between 1967 and 2012 the delay was used on a judicial nominee, 31 were during during the Obama administration.[34]
The modify in rules specifically did not apply to legislation or Supreme Courtroom nominees.[33]
Leadership
Senate
| Position | Representative | Party |
|---|---|---|
| President of the Senate | Joe Biden | Democratic |
| Senate Majority Leadership | ||
| President pro tempore | Patrick Leahy | Democratic |
| Senate Majority Leader | Harry Reid | Autonomous |
| Senate Majority Whip | Richard Durbin | Democratic |
| Senate Minority Leadership | ||
| Senate Minority Leader | Mitch McConnell | Republican |
| Senate Minority Whip | John Cornyn | Republican |
Business firm of Representatives
| Position | Representative | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker of the House | John Boehner | Republican |
| Business firm Majority Leadership | ||
| Firm Majority Leader | Eric Cantor | Republican |
| House Majority Whip | Kevin McCarthy | Republican |
| House Minority Leadership | ||
| House Minority Leader | Nancy Pelosi | Democratic |
| House Minority Whip | Steny Hoyer | Democratic |
Speaker of the House election
During the 113th Congress swearing in ceremony and election for Speaker of the Business firm, Ohio representative and Speaker of the 112th Congress John Boehner (R) saw 9 Republican members of Congress either vote for someone else or abstain and vote present. This was a change from the Speaker election in 2010, where Boehner received votes from the unabridged 241 fellow member Republican conclave. Boehner won re-election to the speakership with 220 votes. He needed a majority of members voting, which required 214 of the 426 who voted. Onetime Speaker and California representative Nancy Pelosi (D) in turn received 192 votes.[35]
The nine Republican members who voted for someone other than Boehner include: Justin Amash, Steve Pearce, Jim Bridenstine, Ted Yoho, Paul Broun, Louie Gohmert, Walter Jones, Thomas Massie and Tim Huelskamp. Not all members who voted for someone other than Boehner or Pelosi voted for a electric current member of the U.S. House. Outgoing member Allen Westward, onetime Comptroller Full general David Walker and former Secretary of Land Colin Powell all received votes.[35] This highlights the fact that the speaker does not have to be a member of the U.S. House, although all previous speakers have been.[36]
Post-obit the vote, the leadership of the U.Southward. Firm of Representatives remained the same as it was in the 112th Us Congress.
Members
-
- See also: Listing of current members of the U.S. Congress
Partisan residuum
These numbers reflect the makeup of the 113th Congress. For the makeup of the 114th Congress, please visit the 114th United states Congress.
| Senate Partisan Balance | |
|---|---|
| Party | 113th Congress |
| Democratic | 53 |
| Republican | 45 |
| Contained | 2 |
| Full | 100 |
| House Partisan Residue | |
|---|---|
| Political party | 113th Congress |
| Democratic | 201 |
| Republican | 234 |
| Vacancies | 0 |
| Total | 435 |
Reputation
The 113th Congress saw depression approval ratings throughout nigh of its session. In November of 2013, Gallup reported a nine percent approval rating for Congress. This was effectively the lowest approval rating for Congress ever recorded.[37] [38] The blessing ratings led many political analysts to argue that the 113th Congress was possibly the worst in recent history. A poll by CNN was released in December of 2013 and stated that two-thirds of Americans believed the 113th Congress was the worst of their lifetime.[39]
Approval rating
| Congressional Approval Rating (2015) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poll | Approve | Disapprove | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||||
| Fox News April 19-21, 2015 | xix% | 75% | 693 | ||||||||||||||||
| The Economist/YouGov April 18-20, 2015 | xiv% | 63% | i,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| ABC News/Launder Postal service March 26-29, 2015 | 22% | 70% | ane,003 | ||||||||||||||||
| CBS News March 21-24, 2015 | 22% | 70% | 1,023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gallup March 5-viii, 2015 | 18% | 75% | 1,025 | ||||||||||||||||
| Fox News January 25-27, 2015 | eighteen% | 73% | i,009 | ||||||||||||||||
| The Economist/YouGov January 24-26, 2015 | 19% | 57% | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| United states Today/Suffolk January 21-24, 2015 | fourteen% | 75% | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Wall Street Journal January xiv-17, 2015 | 16% | 76% | 800 | ||||||||||||||||
| CBS News January 9-12, 2015 | 16% | 72% | one,001 | ||||||||||||||||
| Annotation: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a role of the poll. The polls to a higher place may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling called by Ballotpedia staff. If yous would like to nominate some other poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org | |||||||||||||||||||
Congressional committees
U.Due south. House
Congressional committees (Business firm)
| Page: |
|---|
| U.s. House of Representatives Committee on Strange Affairs |
| United states of america House of Representatives Committee on House Administration |
| Usa House of Representatives Commission on Educational activity and the Workforce |
| United States House of Representatives Commission on Judiciary |
| Usa House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources |
| U.s.a. House of Representatives Committee on Free energy and Commerce |
| United States Business firm of Representatives Committee on Financial Services |
| United States House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations |
| U.s.a. House of Representatives Committee on Armed services |
| United states House of Representatives Commission on Ethics |
| U.s. House of Representatives Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) |
| United states of america Firm of Representatives Committee on Small Business |
| United States Business firm of Representatives Commission on Oversight and Government Reform |
| United states House of Representatives Commission on Agronomics |
| United States House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security |
| United States Firm of Representatives Committee on Rules |
| United states of america Firm of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means |
| United States House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure |
| The states House of Representatives Commission on Budget |
| United states of america Firm of Representatives Commission on Science, Infinite, and Engineering |
| U.s.a. House of Representatives Committee on Veterans' Affairs |
U.Southward. Senate
Congressional committees (Senate)
| Folio: |
|---|
| United States Senate Committee on Armed Services |
| United States Senate Commission on Ethics (Select) |
| Usa Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship |
| United States Senate Commission on Agronomics, Nutrition, and Forestry |
| United states of america Senate Commission on Indian Affairs |
| Usa Senate Committee on Veterans' Diplomacy |
| United states of america Senate Committee on Aging (Special) |
| United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Diplomacy |
| United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation |
| U.s.a. Senate Commission on Energy and Natural Resources |
| United States Senate Commission on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs |
| United States Senate Committee on Rules and Administration |
| United States Senate Committee on Appropriations |
| Us Senate Committee on Foreign Relations |
| The states Senate Committee on Health, Teaching, Labor, and Pensions |
| United states of america Senate Committee on Surround and Public Works |
| United States Senate Committee on Intelligence (Select) |
| U.s.a. Senate Commission on Budget |
| United States Senate Commission on Finance |
| U.s. Senate Committee on the Judiciary |
Joint committees
Congressional committees (Joint)
| Page: |
|---|
| United States Congress Articulation Commission on Printing |
| United states Congress Articulation Commission on the Library |
| United states of america Congress Joint Economic Commission |
| United States Congress Joint Committee on Taxation |
Analysis
Salary
Members of the 113th Congress were paid $174,000 per year. Senate majority and minority leaders, likewise every bit the president pro tempore, received $193,400. The Speaker of the House received $223,500.[xl]
Some historical facts about the salary of Usa Congress members:
- In 1789, members of the Congress received $half dozen per diem[40]
- In 1874, members of the Congress earned $5,000 per yr[40]
- In 1990, members of the Congress earned $98,400 per twelvemonth[40]
- From 2000-2006, the salary of a member of the United States Congress increased every year, going from $141,300-$165,200 in that time bridge.[forty]
Voting with the party
Senators
Co-ordinate to OpenCongress, a website that tracks how often members of Congress vote with the bulk of their party caucus. In May 2014, at that place were 51 Democrats and 45 Republicans tracked.
Democrats:[41]
- The average (hateful) Democrat voted with the party approximately 95.0 pct of the team.
- The boilerplate (median) Democrat voted with the party approximately 95.55 per centum of the time.
- The top Democrat voted with the party approximately 98.8 percent of the time.
- The bottom Democrat voted with the political party approximately 72.8 pct of the time.
Republicans:[42]
- The average (both mean & median) Republican voted with the party approximately 88.0% of the team.
- The tiptop Republican voted with the party approximately 94.9 percent of the time.
- The bottom Republican voted with the political party approximately 62.7 percent of the time.
Representatives
Co-ordinate to OpenCongress, a website that tracks how often members of Congress vote with the majority of their party caucus. In May 2014, at that place were 198 Democrats and 230 Republicans tracked.
Democrats:[43]
- The boilerplate (mean) Democrat voted with the political party approximately 93.2 percent of the team.
- The average (median) Democrat voted with the party approximately 93.3 per centum of the time.
- The acme Democrat voted with the party approximately 97.0 percentage of the time.
- The bottom Democrat voted with the party approximately lx.six per centum of the fourth dimension.
Republicans:[44]
- The average (mean) Republican voted with the party approximately 94.2 per centum of the team.
- The average (median) Republican voted with the party approximately 94.3 pct of the fourth dimension.
- The top Republican voted with the party approximately 98.2 percentage of the time.
- The lesser Republican voted with the political party approximately 75.ane percentage of the fourth dimension.
Professions
Senate
The post-obit data lists the professions of the members of the U.Southward. Senate in 2013-2014 and the modify in their numbers from the 112th Congress.[45]
- 45 lawyers (-ane)
- 22 businesspeople (0)
- ix career politicians and government employees (-i)
- vii educators (0)
- 4 nonprofit and community workers (+1)
- 3 medical professionals (0)
- three farmers and ranchers (+1)
- 3 career armed services and law enforcement (+1)
- 2 entertainment and media (-1)
- ii other (+1): 1 social worker, 1 engineer
Firm
The following data lists the professions of the members of the U.S. House in 2013-2014 and the change in their numbers from the 112th Congress.[45]
- 128 lawyers (+iii)
- 108 businesspeople (-7)
- 55 career politicians and government employees (+2)
- 44 educators (+ii)
- 29 medical professionals (+1)
- 19 career armed services and constabulary enforcement (+2)
- 12 farmers and ranchers (-1)
- 10 nonprofit and community workers (0)
- 8 amusement and media (+4)
- 7 accountants (0)
- 13 other (-iv): 2 social workers, 1 microbiologist, 1 legal secretary, 2 clergy, ii engineers, 1 youth camp director, one factory supervisor, 1 physicist, 1 carpenter, 1 union rep
Legislative action
The 113th Congress enacted the 2d fewest laws in the nation'southward history. During its two year session, representatives enacted 297 new laws. This was merely 2nd to the 112th Congress, which merely enacted 284 new laws. Assay from Josh Tauberer of GovTrack shows that the both the 112th and 113th Congress were similar in terms of productivity. Though the raw numbers bear witness the 112th lagging behind, Tauberer argues that the 113th could all the same be the least productive in terms of gridlock. "Through Nov, it was going to exist the to the lowest degree productive Congress in terms of bills enacted," Tauberer said. But Congress picked up the footstep during the lame-duck session, passing a flurry of bills, including the massive spending bill called the "Cromnibus."[46]
113th Congress: Demographics
The 113th Congress was the most diverse Congress in the nation'due south history, attributable to a record number of newly elected women and minorities.[i]
Members new to the session, including the first Buddhist to concur a seat in the Senate, were elected on November 6, 2012.[ane] Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), who was appointed to fill up the vacancy left by the resignation of Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), was the first African American Republican in the Senate since 1979.
At that place were 3 Latino, ane African American and 20 female members of the U.Due south. Senate in the 113th Congress.[i] [47]
Despite the increased diverseness of the 113th Congress, The Washington Post noted that representation of military veterans in Congress was steadily declining. In both chambers only 88 representatives, which was less than 17 percentage of the body, had past military feel. This is in contrast to past sessions, such every bit the 97th Congress, which veterans made upward over 60 percent of both chambers.[48]
Election rivals serving meantime
There were several members of the U.S. House that were one-fourth dimension rivals who faced off in previous elections. This was not a normal occurrence but does happen after redistricting or when a one-time candidate moves. The following is a list of such cases in the 113th Congress.
- Florida delegation
- Illinois delegation
- Nevada delegation
- Washington delegation
See too
- United States Congress elections, 2014
- United States Senate elections, 2014
- U.s.a. Business firm of Representatives elections, 2014
- Results of U.S. Firm elections in presidential election years, 1920-2020
- U.s. Congress
- Us Senate
- The states House of Representatives
- United states of america Congress elections, 2012
- 112th The states Congress
External links
- 113th Congress at C-SPAN
- THOMAS
- Congress.gov
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.ii one.3 1.4 The Washington Post, "The 113th Congress is the most diverse in history," January 3, 2013
- ↑ Slate.com, "For the First Time Ever, We'll Have Two Blackness Senators Serving at the Same Fourth dimension," Jan thirty, 2013
- ↑ The Washington Mail, "Congress's commission chairmen push to reassert their ability," February xiii, 2013
- ↑ CNN "Poll: This is a do-cipher Congress," Dec 26, 2013
- ↑ Govtrack, "H.R. 3590 (111th): Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," accessed November 5, 2013
- ↑ Boston World, "Obama slams 'outrageous myths' on health care; Republicans say president 'plays fast and loose' with facts," August 22, 2009
- ↑ New York Times, "Cancellation of Healthcare Plans Replaces Website Issues every bit Prime Target," October 29, 2013
- ↑ Washington Mail, "The private mandate no longer applies to people whose plans were canceled," December 19, 2013
- ↑ Washington Post, "The Firm is voting on a $940 billion subcontract neb. Hither'due south what's in information technology," accessed June 20, 2013
- ↑ Political leader, "Business firm Farm pecker roll call vote: Who voted confronting the pecker" accessed June 20, 2013
- ↑ 11.0 xi.1 The Hill, "House rejects farm bill" accessed June twenty, 2013
- ↑ Washington Post, "The Senate is voting on a $955 billion farm bill. Hither's what's in information technology." accessed June 20, 2013
- ↑ Congressional Research Service, "The 2013 Farm Bill: A Comparison of the Senate-Passed Bill (S. 954) and Business firm-Reported Bill (H.R. 1947) with Current Law" accessed June 20, 2013
- ↑ CNN "House passes late term ballgame ban" accessed June xx, 2013
- ↑ U.Southward. House, "June 18 Roll Call Vote" accessed June 20, 2013
- ↑ Examiner, "Two Georgia Republicans voted against ballgame ban (Video)" accessed June xx, 2013
- ↑ 17.0 17.ane 17.two Washington Post, "x House Republicans Vote Against Ryan Budget," accessed March 22, 2013
- ↑ CBS News, "Senate Rejects Paul Ryan Budget," accessed March 22, 2013
- ↑ 19.0 19.i 19.2 nineteen.three 19.4 New York Times, "Senate Passes $3.7 Trillion Upkeep, Setting Upward Contentious Negotiations," accessed March 25, 2013
- ↑ Washingtontimes.com"After almost 13 hours, Rand Paul ends Brennan delay" March seven, 2013
- ↑ NYTimes.com, "Republicans, Led by Rand Paul, Finally End Delay," March vii, 2013
- ↑ CNN Poliitical ticker, "Rand Paul on filibuster: 'Nosotros had no plan.'" March 7, 2013
- ↑ FoxNews.com, "Sen. Paul declares 'victory' afterward Holder offers assurance on drones," March 7, 2013
- ↑ NYTimes.com, "Republicans, Led by Rand Paul, Finally Cease Delay," March 7,2013
- ↑ Washingtonexaminer.com, "Rand Paul filibustering over drones: I volition not let Obama 'shred the Constitution,'" March 7, 2013
- ↑ USA Today, "Rand Paul delay ranks among Senate's longest," March 7, 2013
- ↑ CNN, "Rand Paul says he's heard from White Business firm after filibuster," March 7, 2013
- ↑ USA Today, "Rand Paul delay ranks amidst Senate's longest," March 7, 2013
- ↑ ABC News, "Rand Paul Wins Adulation From GOP and Liberals," March 7, 2013
- ↑ Breitbart, "AWOL: Come across The GOP Senators Who Refused to Stand With Rand," March vii, 2013
- ↑ Politico, "Rand Paul delay blasted by Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham," March 7, 2013
- ↑ Washington Mail, "Eric Holder responds to Rand Paul with 'no,'" March 7, 2013
- ↑ 33.0 33.one Politico, "Senate goes for 'nuclear option'," November 21, 2013
- ↑ 34.0 34.i Washington Postal service, "Reid, Democrats trigger 'nuclear' option; eliminate most filibusters on nominees," November 21, 2013
- ↑ 35.0 35.i The Hill, "Boehner re-elected as Speaker; ix Republicans defect in vote," January iii, 2013
- ↑ Office of the Clerk, "House Leadership & Officers," accessed January 3, 2013
- ↑ Gallup, "Congressional approval sinks to record low," November 11, 2014
- ↑ Real Clear Politics, "Congressional Approval," accessed December 24, 2014
- ↑ CNN "Poll: This is a do-cipher Congress," Dec 26, 2013
- ↑ forty.0 twoscore.1 40.2 40.3 forty.4 U.S. Senate, "Salaries," accessed May 29, 2012
- ↑ OpenCongress, "Voting With Party," accessed May 16, 2014
- ↑ OpenCongress, "Voting With Party," accessed May sixteen, 2014
- ↑ OpenCongress, "Voting With Party," accessed May 16, 2014
- ↑ OpenCongress, "Voting With Political party," accessed May xvi, 2014
- ↑ 45.0 45.ane Bloomberg Businessweek, "The 113th Congress, past the Numbers," January 10, 2013
- ↑ National Journal, "No, the 113th Congress Wasn't the To the lowest degree Productive Ever," December 23, 2014
- ↑ MSNBC.com, "113th Congress past the numbers," Jan 3, 2013
- ↑ Washington Post, "Interesting demographic facts most the 113th Congress," November eleven, 2013
| United States Congress | ||
|---|---|---|
| Background | The states Senate • United states of america House of Representatives • U.s.a. Constitution • Federal Ballot Commission • Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee • National Republican Congressional Committee • Lifetime voting records • Net Worth of United states of america Senators and Representatives • Staff salaries of Usa Senators and Representatives • Filing requirements for congressional candidates • Filling vacancies in the U.S. Senate • Classes of United States Senators • President Pro Tempore of the Senate • United states of america Speaker of the House • Filibuster |  |
| States' delegations | Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Bailiwick of jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • Due north Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Isle • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming • Non-voting members | |
| Special elections | 2021-2022 • 2019-2020 • 2017-2018 • 2015-2016 • 2013-2014 | |
| 2022 | Congress Elections • Senate Elections • Firm Elections • Candidates running for Congress | |
| 2020 | Congress Elections • Senate Elections • House Elections • Candidates who ran for Congress | |
| 2018 | Congress Elections • Senate Elections • House Elections • Candidates who ran for Congress | |
| 2016 | Congress Elections • Senate Elections • House Elections • Candidates who ran for Congress | |
| 2014 | Congress Elections • Senate Elections • Business firm Elections • Candidates who ran for Congress | |
| Sessions | 117th United States Congress • 116th U.s.a. Congress • 115th United states Congress • 114th United States Congress • 113th U.s.a. Congress • 112th U.s. Congress • 111th United States Congress • 110th United States Congress | |
| Articulation Congressional committees | Deficit Reduction • Printing • Taxation • Library • Economical | |
| U.S. Senate Committees | Aging • Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry • Appropriations • Armed services • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs • Upkeep • Commerce, Science and Transportation • Energy and Natural Resources • Environment and Public Works • Ethics (Select) • Finance • Strange Relations • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs • Indian Diplomacy • Intelligence (Select) • Judiciary • Rules and Administration • Minor Business organization and Entrepreneurship • Veterans' Affairs | |
| U.Due south. House Committees | Agriculture • Appropriations • Armed Services • Budget • Educational activity and the Workforce • Energy and Commerce • Ideals • Financial Services • Foreign Diplomacy • Homeland Security • House Administration • Intelligence (Permanent Select) • Judiciary • Natural Resource • U.s. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Regime Reform • Rules • Science, Space, and Engineering • Small Business • Transportation and Infrastructure • Veterans' Affairs • Ways and Means | |
| Super PACs | American Bridge 21st Century • American Crossroads • American Unity PAC • Campaign for Primary Accountability • Social club for Growth Action • Congressional Leadership Fund • Cooperative of American Physicians IE Committee• Crossroads Generation • Ending Spending Action Fund • Endorse Freedom • Fair Share Action • FreedomWorks for America • Government Integrity Fund • House Majority PAC • Independence USA Fund • League of Conservation Voters • Liberty for All PAC • Senate Majority PAC • National Association of Realtors • NEA Advocacy Fund • NextGen Climate Activity • Now or Never PAC • Planned Parenthood Votes • Prepare for Hillary • Republican Jewish Coalition Victory Fund • Restore America's Vox PAC • SEIU Pea-Federal • Women Vote! • Workers' Vocalisation | |
| Personal Gain Index | Changes in Internet Worth of U.S. Senators and Representatives • The Donation Concentration Metric | |
| Ballotpedia | |
|---|---|
| About | Overview • What people are saying • Support Ballotpedia • Contact • Contribute • Job opportunities |
| Executive: Leslie Graves, President • Gwen Beattie, Chief Operating Officeholder • Ken Carbullido, Vice President of Election Product and Technology Strategy Communications: Kayla Harris • Megan Brown • Sarah Groat • Lauren Nemerovski Contributors: Scott Rasmussen | |
| Editorial | Geoff Pallay, Editor-in-Chief • Daniel Anderson, Managing Editor • Josh Altic, Managing Editor • Cory Eucalitto, Managing Editor • Mandy Gillip, Managing Editor • Jerrick Adams • Victoria Antram • Dave Beaudoin • Jaclyn Beran • Marielle Bricker • Ryan Byrne • Kate Carsella • Kelly Coyle • Megan Feeney • Juan García de Paredes • Sara Horton • Tyler Rex • Doug Kronaizl • Amee LaTour • David Luchs • Brittony Maag • Andrew McNair • Jackie Mitchell • Elisabeth Moore • Ellen Morrissey • Mackenzie Murphy • Samantha Post • Paul Rader • Ethan Rice • Myj Saintyl • Maddie Sinclair Johnson • Abbey Smith • Janie Valentine • Caitlin Vanden Boom • Joel Williams • Corinne Wolyniec • Samuel Wonacott • Mercedes Yanora |
Source: https://ballotpedia.org/113th_United_States_Congress
0 Response to "Bills Passed by House of Representatives 112th Congress"
Post a Comment